We Need More Reports of Global Health Anesthesia Articles.

نویسنده

  • Mark J Harris
چکیده

Anesthesiology, V 124 • No 2 267 February 2016 I n the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery’s introductory editorial, Meara et al.1 state that “Surgery and anaesthesia are integral, indivisible components of any properly functioning health system.” These components, although undoubtedly indivisible, currently appear unbalanced. A PubMed search for “surgery” paired with the usual indicators of low-resource programs (e.g., “global,” “international,” “low resource,” or “austere”) reveals over 400 relevant articles. A search for corresponding anesthesia terms finds 30. Of course, articles in journals from low-income regions address the scholarly practice of surgery and anesthesia without any such global tags. However, the theme of this essay is the apparent paucity of publications regarding collaborative education, funding, or service programs addressing the anesthesia needs in lowincome countries (LICs). There are many reasons that indexed global anesthesia articles are scarce. Many LIC journals publish infrequently, are difficult to obtain, and are not internationally indexed.2 To address this, there are ongoing collaborations intent on increasing the production, quality, sustainability, and availability of journals from the low-resource world.3 In the meantime, specialist journals from high-income countries (HICs) consider many such articles too esoteric for their readership. More traditional global health journals often deem anesthesia articles too specialized for their readership. Reports of volunteer experiences are common in the non– peer-reviewed literature.4 Most are snapshot reports and interesting only for a general readership unfamiliar with the topic. Many reflect the viewpoints of their publishing societies, with little controversy or innovation. Given the recent recognition of surgery as a global health priority (i.e., the 68th World Health Assembly resolution on “Strengthening Emergency and Essential Surgical Care and Anaesthesia,”5 the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery,1 and the dedicated surgery volume in the World Bank’s “Disease Control Priorities 3”6), we may see an increased interest by HIC journals in global anesthesia articles. To take advantage of such enthusiasm, we must address another potential reason for the dearth of publication, that is, the work is not being done. This is not a reference to simple participation in the global health endeavor. Anesthesiologists from HICs are fundamental to a myriad of surgical service missions7,8 and education, staff-development, and capacitybuilding programs in LICs.9,10 Rather, the thesis is that too few HIC anesthesiologists are analyzing their programs and publishing their conclusions. Despite 15 yr of international work, this author’s publication history is very limited. This essay is the product of an exploration of this shortfall, its importance, and potential incentives to change. Despite filling 177 African journals11 with relevant work, local practitioners are at capacity. With less than 1 anesthesia provider per 100,000 population12 (compared with 24 per 100,000 in the United States),13 and workloads of 2,000 procedures per year per provider,14 anesthetists in LICs have little time for scholarship. Many are not trained in scientific research, and most have limited scholastic resources.15 Clinicians in HICs, whether academic or private practitioners, have received more training, have greater access to academic institutions, and can dedicate focused time to the problem. not only do scholarly collaborations support capacity building in LICs, but, as Søreide et al. argue, they provide significant opportunity to “mutually enhance care for patients with surgical disorders,”16 that is, international collaborative research can facilitate quicker patient enrollment to larger studies with more generalizable results, benefitting patients at both ends of the income spectrum. This cannot happen unless HIC anesthetists actively engage in the academic process. Many expert HIC clinicians, inexperienced in global anesthesia provision, travel to LICs armed with good intentions and donated equipment. Adverse events frequently We Need More Reports of Global Health Anesthesia Articles

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Universal Health Coverage: Broadening the Scope; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”

Universal health coverage (UHC) is high on the global health agenda, and priority setting is fundamental to the fair and efficient pursuit of this goal. In a recent editorial, Rob Baltussen and colleagues point to the need to go beyond evidence on cost-effectiveness and call for evidence-informed deliberative processes when setting priorities for UHC. Such processes are crucial at every step on...

متن کامل

Politics or Technocracy – What Next for Global Health?; Comment on “Navigating Between Stealth Advocacy and Unconscious Dogmatism: The Challenge of Researching the Norms, Politics and Power of Global Health”

Politics play a central part in determining health and development outcomes as Gorik Ooms highlights in his recent commentary. As health becomes more global and more politicized the need grows to better understand the inherently political processes at all levels of governance, such as ideological positions, ideas, value judgments, and power. I agree that global health research should strengthen...

متن کامل

Health Technology Assessment: Global Advocacy and Local Realities; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can help countries attain and sustain universal health coverage (UHC), as long as it is context-specific and considered within deliberative processes at the country level. Institutionalising robust deliberative processes requires significant time and resources, however, and countries often begin by demanding evidence (including local CEA evidence as well as evi...

متن کامل

Global Surgery – Redirecting Strategies for a Global Research Agenda; Comment on “Global Surgery – Informing National Strategies for Scaling Up Surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa”

More than three years have passed since the publication of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery and its recommendations on scaling up surgery in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). An important gap, the voice of the districts as well as lack of contextualized research, has been noted in its support of national surgical plans that run the risk of being at best, aspirational. Moreover, a ‘one-size-fits-...

متن کامل

Corruption in Health Systems: The Conversation Has Started, Now Time to Continue it; Comment on “We Need to Talk About Corruption in Health Systems”

Holistic and multi-disciplinary responses should be prioritized given the depth and breadth through which corruption in the healthcare sector can cover. Here, taking the Peruvian context as an example, we will reflect on the issue of corruption in health systems, including corruption with roots within and outside the health sector, and ongoing efforts to combat it. Our ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Anesthesiology

دوره 124 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016